llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Michael Park (mpark) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when the latter mention is actually describing right-associative operators. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp (+1-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp index 1405aef700bec5..64f284d78b24db 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(ExprResult LHS, prec::Level MinPrec) { RHS = ExprError(); } // If this is left-associative, only parse things on the RHS that bind - // more tightly than the current operator. If it is left-associative, it + // more tightly than the current operator. If it is right-associative, it // is okay, to bind exactly as tightly. For example, compile A=B=C=D as // A=(B=(C=D)), where each paren is a level of recursion here. // The function takes ownership of the RHS. `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
