jroelofs added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28820#649770, @efriedma wrote:
> > There would be a big performance penalty for ISRs with callees that don't > > use VFP regs. > > Sacrificing correctness for the sake of performance seems like a bad idea... I don't quite see it that way, but I understand where you're coming from. > especially given that the optimizer can insert calls to memcpy where they > didn't originally exist in the source. That, however, is the nail in the coffin of my argument :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D28820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
