aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28924#651139, @jordan_rose wrote:
> Interestingly, this case doesn't actually work yet; we unconditionally print > enum attributes after the close-brace even though that's not valid for C++ > attributes. Do you think I should change that as well, or just land this > patch as is? This is a pervasive issue with attributes, now that I put my thinking cap on. I think you're fine to land it as-is; we need a much larger fix to handle pretty printing attributes properly for all flavors. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D28924 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
