================
@@ -1205,10 +1298,19 @@ class LOAD32<BPFWidthModifer SizeOp, BPFModeModifer
ModOp, string OpcodeStr, lis
class LOADi32<BPFWidthModifer SizeOp, BPFModeModifer ModOp, string OpcodeStr,
PatFrag OpNode>
: LOAD32<SizeOp, ModOp, OpcodeStr, [(set i32:$dst, (OpNode
ADDRri:$addr))]>;
+class LOAD_ACQUIREi32<BPFWidthModifer SizeOp, string OpcodeStr>
+ : LOAD_ACQUIRE<SizeOp, OpcodeStr, GPR32>;
+
let Predicates = [BPFHasALU32], DecoderNamespace = "BPFALU32" in {
def LDW32 : LOADi32<BPF_W, BPF_MEM, "u32", load>;
def LDH32 : LOADi32<BPF_H, BPF_MEM, "u16", zextloadi16>;
def LDB32 : LOADi32<BPF_B, BPF_MEM, "u8", zextloadi8>;
+
+ let Predicates = [BPFHasLoadAcquire] in {
----------------
eddyz87 wrote:
Is there a reason to define these (and stores) behind `BPFHasALU32` flag?
>From instruction encoding pow we use STX class, which has no 32/64
>sub-division.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
