mgorny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29542#667814, @joerg wrote:
> At this point, I don't think there is any use on pretending that > i386-as-default makes sense. So I would request that the i386 case should be > made explicit or just dropped, with a preference for the latter. By the former, do you mean making `CK_Generic` imply i486+ or i586+? What about line ~3947 where the same conditions are used to control other definitions? Should they be changed too? https://reviews.llvm.org/D29542 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
