philnik777 wrote: > I'm personally sympathetic, and would be ok with something that we know MSVC > won't step on (`__clang_msvc__` would be fine to me). As far as the > `no_unique_address`, I THINK we already get the double-underscore spelling of > that, don't we? I don't think we exclude the MSVC spellings from that.
AFAICT you're only allowed to \_\_uglify\_\_ attributes with no namespace, `clang`, or `gnu`. At least clang 18 rejects `msvc::__no_unique_address__` with a warning: https://godbolt.org/z/zq89ssnh1 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113765 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
