AaronBallman wrote: > Thanks, @AaronBallman, > > > > Ideally, I think we would do the following at some point to improve > > > compatibility with MSVC. > > > > > > I'm not opposed, but I am concerned about the potential to subtly break > > user code that's relying on our current search path behavior. We may need > > to find some clever diagnostics for cases where lookup would have > > previously succeeded or found a different file. > > The changes I was suggesting in that comment would not change what files are > found; it would only affect whether the file was to be treated as a user or > system header.
Doesn't that impact whether a header is found via `""` or `<>` syntax? e.g., if something went from a user header to a system header, I thought that meant the search order would then change depending on which include syntax you used? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105738 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
