boris-kolpackov wrote: I don't know, I feel like you are just kicking the can down the road: if the user sees a harmless warning continuously, they will suppress this warning, and then won't see the harmful ones in the future. But then again we do this all the time in C++, so I guess it's par for the course.
> after reading your links, I realized you're not against the change but saying > build2 is good. Well, not exactly. We have better chance in `build2` because we control the entire build (unless you use system-installed libraries, but in this case we still build the BMIs). And we thought a bit about build compatibility (in that HOWTO) and what compile options should and should not be specified in library `buildfiles`, which I think will also help with BMI compatibility. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115416 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
