================ @@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ void test_invalid_call(int s) { int var = some_func(undef1); } +int some_func2(int a, int b); +void test_invalid_call_2() { + // CHECK: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors + // CHECK-NEXT: |-UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2' + // CHECK-NEXT: `-IntegerLiteral {{.*}} 'int' 1 + some_func2(1, ); +} + +void test_invalid_call_3() { + // CHECK: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors + // CHECK-NEXT: -UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2' + some_func2(,); +} + +void test_invalid_call_4() { + // CHECK: `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors + // CHECK-NEXT: -UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2' + some_func2(,,); ---------------- hokein wrote:
I should have been clearer earlier. I think it’s fine that clang doesn’t handle recovery well in this case. I’m just curious about it and not suggesting you address it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114684 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits