================
@@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ void test_invalid_call(int s) {
   int var = some_func(undef1);
 }
 
+int some_func2(int a, int b);
+void test_invalid_call_2() {
+  // CHECK:   `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: |-UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' 
lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2'
+  // CHECK-NEXT: `-IntegerLiteral {{.*}} 'int' 1
+  some_func2(1, );
+}
+
+void test_invalid_call_3() {
+  // CHECK:   `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: -UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' 
lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2'
+  some_func2(,);
+}
+
+void test_invalid_call_4() {
+  // CHECK:   `-RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+  // CHECK-NEXT: -UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} '<overloaded function type>' 
lvalue (ADL) = 'some_func2'
+  some_func2(,,);
----------------
hokein wrote:

I should have been clearer earlier. I think it’s fine that clang doesn’t handle 
recovery well in this case. I’m just curious about it and not suggesting you 
address it.







https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114684
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to