================
@@ -6082,6 +6084,7 @@ TEST_P(ASTImporterLookupTableTest, 
LookupSearchesInTheWholeRedeclChain) {
   auto Res = LT.lookup(N1, Name);
   ASSERT_EQ(Res.size(), 1u);
   EXPECT_EQ(*Res.begin(), A);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(LT.lookup(N2, Name).empty());
----------------
Michael137 wrote:

So prior to your change this lookup would've found `A`? Because the 
`LookupTable` would unconditionally use the primary context?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118466
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to