pirama marked 2 inline comments as done.
pirama added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:289
+ CmdArgs.push_back("-rpath");
+ CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(CandidateRPath.c_str()));
+ }
----------------
rnk wrote:
> We shouldn't add rpath to every binary linked by clang. We should only add
> rpath when we know the user is linking against a shared library provided by
> clang. See for example the way the darwin toolchain handles this in
> Toolchains.cpp.
>
> Right now most libraries provided by clang are static, so there hasn't been
> much need to add rpath, but if we add more shared libraries (xray,
> sanitizers, profiling, etc), then I think we'll want to do this along with
> adding an option to suppress the implicit addition of rpath.
PTAL.
================
Comment at: test/Driver/arch-specific-libdir-rpath.c:18
+//
+// CHECK-ARCHDIR:
-L{{.*}}/Inputs/resource_dir_with_arch_subdir/lib/linux{{.*}} "-rpath"
{{.*}}/Inputs/resource_dir_with_arch_subdir/lib/linux
+// CHECK-NO-ARCHDIR-NOT: -L{{.*}}Inputs/resource_dir
----------------
pirama wrote:
> mgorny wrote:
> > pirama wrote:
> > > Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > > Can you split that into two lines? Then it won't fail if there is some
> > > > argument added in between
> > > Splitting into two lines makes FileCheck eagerly match the arch-subdir
> > > and -rpath into the {{.*}} next to the "-L". This causes the check for
> > > -rpath to fail.
> > >
> > > The test accepts intermediate arguments because of the wildcard right
> > > after the -L...Inputs/...
> > Please do not rely on implicit assumptions like that. One day someone may
> > decide to 'fix' the wildcard not to match whitespace, and make the wrong
> > assumption about order. If for anything, splitting in two would make this
> > more readable.
> Do you have any suggestions? Right now, if I split it into two lines, the
> second check fails due to the eager regex match.
Done. I was able to get the exact path from the -cc1 invocation and use it to
remove the wildcards.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30015
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits