erichkeane wrote: > > ...that the template cases are going to be REALLY noisy > > @erichkeane It looks like that's why I have two failed tests from > `llvm-libc++-shared-cfg-in` due to the use of qualifiers
Yep, that looks to be exactly the case! I'd be interested to see if @ldionne would be willing to accept a `std::remove_cv_t` or something on those. This diagnostic is likely going to require/cause a level of const/volatile cleanliness in base classes that no one has ever really thought about before. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121419 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
