================
@@ -2235,6 +2235,24 @@ TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest,
ArgumentCountIs_CXXConstructExpr) {
Constructor1Arg));
}
+TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest, HasDependentName_DependentScopeDeclRefExpr) {
+ if (!GetParam().isCXX() || GetParam().hasDelayedTemplateParsing()) {
+ // FIXME: Fix this test to work with delayed template parsing.
+ return;
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(matches("template <class T> class X : T { void f() { T::v; } };",
+ dependentScopeDeclRefExpr(hasDependentName("v"))));
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(matches("template <typename T> struct S { static T Foo; };"
+ "template <typename T> void x() { (void)S<T>::Foo; }",
+ dependentScopeDeclRefExpr(hasDependentName("Foo"))));
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(matches("template <typename T> struct S { static T foo(); };"
+ "template <typename T> void x() { S<T>::foo; }",
----------------
HighCommander4 wrote:
nit: it would make the example more realistic if the function is actually
called, as in `S<T>::foo();`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121656
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
