xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30798#697115, @zaks.anna wrote:
> I've committed the change, but would very much appreciate community feedback > here if if there is any! I agree with the change. Users are usually not interested in the results from the standard library, and since the standard library supposed to be well tested, it is very unlikely that the analyzer could find a true positive there. One side effect would be the suppression of results that materialize due to the misuse of those APIs. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D30798 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
