dexonsmith added a comment.

> ! In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28299#701194, @dexonsmith wrote:
>  Rebased again, and cleaned up tests, and a ping... now that dependencies are 
> resolved.
> 
> Richard and/or Ben, can you take a look?

(Or anyone else that feels comfortable confirming that the ownership semantics 
of MemoryBufferCache are correct.)


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28299



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D28299: Mo... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D2829... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D2829... Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D2829... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to