On 03/16/2017 07:40 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:37 PM Hal Finkel via Phabricator
<revi...@reviews.llvm.org <mailto:revi...@reviews.llvm.org>> wrote:
hfinkel added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30415#703398, @echristo wrote:
> Different suggestion:
>
> Remove the faltivec option. Even gcc doesn't support it anymore
afaict.
What are you suggesting? Always having the language extensions on?
Or explicitly tying the language extensions to the underlying
target feature?
I was thinking the latter.
Is that what GCC now does?
-Hal
-eric
> (Go ahead and commit the zvector part if you'd like).
>
> -eric
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30415
--
Hal Finkel
Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
