JustinStitt wrote: RFC regarding canonical wrapping/non-wrapping types in Clang: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-canonical-wrapping-and-non-wrapping-types/84356
Ultimately, a type like what the RFC describes would supersede this PR in terms of feature completeness and usefulness. I'll close this PR if that RFC suggests a new direction is required. pings: @erichkeane pinging you because you asked about an RFC. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115094 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
