llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> This test does succeed in MinGW configurations. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126139.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/unique_object_duplication.cpp (+2-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/unique_object_duplication.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/unique_object_duplication.cpp index 8a19fb7b81187a..4b41bfbfdc2f75 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/unique_object_duplication.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/unique_object_duplication.cpp @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=hidden -Wunique-object-duplication -fvisibility=hidden -Wno-unused-value %s // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunique-object-duplication -Wno-unused-value %s -// The check is currently disabled on windows. The test should fail because we're not getting the expected warnings. -// XFAIL: target={{.*}}-windows{{.*}}, {{.*}}-ps{{(4|5)(-.+)?}} +// The check is currently disabled on windows in MSVC-like environments. The test should fail because we're not getting the expected warnings. +// XFAIL: target={{.*}}-windows-msvc, {{.*}}-ps{{(4|5)(-.+)?}} #include "unique_object_duplication.h" `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126139 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
