aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:996
 * ``__is_abstract`` (GNU, Microsoft)
+* ``__is_aggregate`` (GNU, Microsoft)
 * ``__is_base_of`` (GNU, Microsoft)
----------------
Has Microsoft already implemented this? If not, do we want to wait for them 
before claiming they implement it as well?


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:4234
+    // support aggregate initialization. GCC mirrors this behavior for vectors
+    // but not _Complex.
+    return T->isAggregateType() || T->isVectorType() || T->isExtVectorType() ||
----------------
Is there benefit to diverging from GCC's behavior here for _Complex types?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D31513



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to