zmodem wrote: > but, that is still not a great reproducer for a reverted patch. Especially if > the link issue is due to a missing support in linker. I would appreciate if > you could maybe point to how exactly UnicodeString is used in failing > scenario.
I'm sorry that we didn't catch this problem sooner and were able to provide better reproducers. I still think reverting was right though. There is clearly a subtle problem here -- both at link time and run time -- and the fewer people who run into that the better. Even if it turns out that the root cause lies in lld. I've uploaded a stand-alone from-source reproducer of the run time crash here: https://crbug.com/402425841#comment10 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126240 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
