baloghadamsoftware added a comment. Hello! I am not sure how to split it to incremental patches. As I mentioned in the description, the state of the iterator position is always tracked. So if I remove some of the checks it does not make the patch much smaller, since the checking part is quite small. If I remove parts of the tracking, I introduce lots of false positives and uncaught bugs.
Container and offset tracking is needed for both range and validity checks. Match check does not need the offset, but removing it means lots of work, and does not help either because the second patch (adding range and validity checks incrementally) will remain huge. Doing the rename in a separate patch is useless, because this checker is totally new: the whole position tracking uses a new concept. What I reused is the method of transferring the position between various SVals. Doing the rename separately would mean the same amount of green and lots of red. What I could do is to rearrange of the functions a bit (separate tracking and checking) and adding more comments to the function. Would it help? https://reviews.llvm.org/D31975 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
