AaronBallman wrote: > So the changes needed to move this patch forward are to only perform the > attribute check when we're checking for a valid redefinition, not type > compatibility in general. A follow-up to improve upon this can do the layout > check when looking for compatibility. Alternatively (or as another > follow-up), we can implement the case-by-case basis logic. > > Does that match your understanding @jyknight?
Ping on this @jyknight https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132939 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
