rockeet wrote: > > > This patch adds support for GCC bound member functions extension: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Bound-member-functions.html > > > Related issue: #22495 Closes #82727 > > > > > > I think this requires an RFC justifying carrying the extension. It's a > > non-conforming extension that we previously decided we would not implement > > (#22495 was closed as `WONTFIX`), and there's no real motivation for the > > feature request listed in #82727. > > (Personally, I think #82727 should be closed as a duplicate of #22495 > > unless there's a very strong justification for carrying the extension.) > > #82727 was filed because this extension is used by topling-zip: > https://github.com/topling/topling-zip/blob/4c57da837bf1a1612a1524ddf8d258a69f1c3874/src/terark/zbs/blob_store.hpp#L56-L68 > > I decided to implement this feature after I read the post by @rockeet > :https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/683534962 (in Chinese). TBH I don't think this > feature is useful as modern compilers should be smart enough to optimize out > redundant vtable lookups. > > cc @rockeet Are you willing to propose an RFC in https://discourse.llvm.org/ > to demonstrate its real-world usefulness in ToplingDB?
Yes, I'm very eager for this feature, let me investigate the RFC proposal routine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
