wenju-he wrote: > You could just have `cos_fp32.cl` and `cos_fp16.cl`, of course.
Yes. To enable overriding generic implementation of `cos.cl`, the names in target folder could be `cos.cl` and `cos_fp16.cl` > I would like to further investigate weak linkage as another means of > overriding specific builtins down to a finer granularity. That approach might > warrant another method of file discovery. It would bring unnecessary builds and may increase build time. Filename overriding should be better. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135710 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
