=?utf-8?q?Félix?= Cloutier <fclout...@apple.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Félix?= Cloutier <fclout...@apple.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Félix?= Cloutier <fclout...@apple.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135...@github.com>
================
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-non-iso
-Wformat-pedantic -fblocks %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-non-iso
-fblocks -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-non-iso
-Wformat-pedantic -fblocks -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-non-iso
-Wformat-pedantic -fblocks -std=c++20 %s
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202000l
+// expected-note@-6{{format string computed from non-literal expression}}
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Better to use `// #bookmark` and then `expected-note@#bookmark` closer to where
the diagnostic comes from which generates the note. (My immediate question was
"what's special about C++20?" when the answer was "the code which generates the
note only runs in C++20".)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135864
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
