alexfh wrote:

This commit changed the behavior of the following code 
(https://godbolt.org/z/r1q55e1jv / https://godbolt.org/z/GsPqxaf3G):
```
#include <vector>

constexpr unsigned long num = 123;

void foo() {
    // OK
    (void)std::vector<unsigned long>({num});

    // Fail
    (void)std::vector<long>({num});
}
```
In the second case Clang choses a different vector constructor. See also 
https://godbolt.org/z/ecWo4E6z4.

Is this change in the behavior expected?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136203
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to