CaseyCarter added inline comments.

================
Comment at: test/support/archetypes.hpp:20
 protected:
+#endif // !TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_BROKEN_ZA_CTOR_CHECK
   NullBase() = default;
----------------
STL_MSFT wrote:
> I think that this comment doesn't match the ifndef check, but it's a style 
> question.
I know which style *I* prefer, because I wrote it, and I know which style *you* 
prefer, because you commented. I'll change this when Marshall or Eric let me 
know what they prefer here.


================
Comment at: test/support/archetypes.ipp:10
+#ifdef TEST_WORKAROUND_EDG_EXPLICIT_CONSTEXPR
+#define DEFINE_CONSTEXPR
+#else // TEST_WORKAROUND_EDG_EXPLICIT_CONSTEXPR
----------------
STL_MSFT wrote:
> Should you define it to be `inline` instead of nothing?
This macro is typically defined to either `constexpr` or nothing - see the 
definitions in `archetypes.hpp` above.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D32778



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to