zmodem wrote: I don't know all the background here, so apologies if this is a silly question, but we have some code that's checking:
``` static_assert(__is_trivially_relocatable(std::pair<const int, int>)); ``` which now triggers a -Wdeprecated-builtins warning. But if I switch to `__builtin_is_cpp_trivially_relocatable` instead, it fails: ``` error: static assertion failed due to requirement '__builtin_is_cpp_trivially_relocatable(std::pair<const int, int>)' ``` Is this intentional? (I also tried `__builtin_is_replaceable`, and that also fails.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139061 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
