================
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+//===--- FunctionVisibilityChangeCheck.h - clang-tidy -----------*- C++ 
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_BUGPRONE_FUNCTIONVISIBILITYCHANGECHECK_H
+#define 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_BUGPRONE_FUNCTIONVISIBILITYCHANGECHECK_H
+
+#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
+
+namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
+
+/// Check function visibility changes in subclasses.
+///
+/// For the user-facing documentation see:
+/// 
http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/function-visibility-change.html
+class FunctionVisibilityChangeCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
+public:
+  FunctionVisibilityChangeCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+      : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+  void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
+  void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
+  bool isLanguageVersionSupported(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const override {
+    return LangOpts.CPlusPlus;
+  }
----------------
PiotrZSL wrote:

Consider adding some option to exclude some methods by name, for example if I 
would have some generic method like "process_event" that I change visibility on 
prupose, then maybe would be good to have option for that, or option to allow 
of changing visibility for some base classes.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140086
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to