AaronBallman wrote: > > That probably should continue to work -- we accept it today and so does GCC > > GCC started accepting it from version 14, likely when fixing > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264 (it is mentioned in > [#54016 > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54016#issuecomment-1752262953)), > but it also started accepting `IA{ 1, 2, 3 } + 0`, which is clearly wrong > https://godbolt.org/z/r7Yc3o1qd @pinskia @jicama > > I think, if someone wants 100% C compatibility, then they should make > compound literals lvalues. If compound literals are prvalues in C++ > extension, then they should be treated like other array prvalues
Ugh, I was backwards again. They're prvalues in C++ already, not lvalues as in C, so yes, it should be rejected in C++ with your changes. Sorry for the confusion! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140702 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
