zmodem wrote: > Now we have a special Wdeprecated-declarations carveouts for switches, but if > you unpack the switch into if / else chain comparisons, you get deprecation > warnings.
Agreed, that it is a bit inconsistent. There is prior art though: ba87c626f9b7c48a79673d3fd682c2a1e80a7200 makes exactly the same carve-out for -Wunguarded-availability (though the mechanism is different). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138562 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
