vsapsai wrote:
> I know what we do is cheesy and we might need to reconsider how to approach
> it, but this is a breaking change and it would be great to find a resolution
> for it before committing to the new behavior. Could we revert this while we
> discuss the potential ways out of it?
What is your timeframe for stopping putting the same header ("wrap_foo.h") into
multiple modules? If you do that it was never guaranteed which module would be
used for a header. I'm willing to unblock you but I'd like to know if you are
committed to fixing the issue in the module maps.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138227
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
