languagelawyer wrote: > it is CWG2548; that's what made it clear that array-to-pointer decay does not > happen here
CWG2548 is closed as NAD, with no changes to the wording. The fact that array-to-pointer decay does not happen has always been clear > despite that being inconsistent with the rest of the language I'd say CWG hallucinated inconsistence, to me there is none https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140702 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
