llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Guillot Tony (to268)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

This PR is documenting the behavior of Clang towards underspecified object 
declarations in C23 as advised by @<!-- -->AaronBallman.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140911.diff


4 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst (+48) 
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+2) 
- (added) clang/test/C/C23/n3006.c (+113) 
- (modified) clang/www/c_status.html (+1-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst 
b/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
index a40dd4d1a1673..aa76daf0ea459 100644
--- a/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
@@ -6454,3 +6454,51 @@ qualifications.
 Note, Clang does not allow an ``_Atomic`` function type because
 of explicit constraints against atomically qualified (arrays and) function
 types.
+
+
+Underspecified object declarations in C
+=======================================
+
+In C23 (N3006), when an object is declared inside of another object and that
+only exists in the scope of the declaration of the outer object. Clang allows
+underspecified object declarations for structs, unions and enums when valid.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  auto s1 = (struct S1 { int x, y; }){ 1, 2 };
+  auto u1 = (union U1 { int a; double b; }){ .a = 34 };
+  auto e1 = (enum E1 { FOO, BAR }){ BAR };
+
+Note, The ``constexpr`` keyword and getting a struct member that is
+underspecified is also allowed.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  constexpr auto cs1 = (struct S1 { int x, y; }){ 1, 2 };
+  constexpr auto cu1 = (union U1 { int a; double b; }){ .a = 34 };
+  constexpr auto ce1 = (enum E1 { FOO, BAR }){ BAR };
+  int i1 = (struct T { int a, b; }){0, 1}.a;
+  constexpr int ci2 = (struct T2 { int a, b; }){0, 1}.a;
+
+Moreover, some unusual cases are also allowed as described bellow.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+  constexpr struct S { int a, b; } y = { 0 };
+  constexpr typeof(struct s *) x = 0;
+  auto so = sizeof(struct S {});
+  auto s = ({struct T { int x; } s = {}; s.x; });
+  constexpr int (*fp)(struct X { int x; } val) = 0;
+  auto v = (void (*)(int y))0;
+
+  constexpr struct {
+      int a;
+  } si = {};
+
+  auto z = ({
+      int a = 12;
+      struct {} s;
+      a;
+  });
+
+All other cases are prohibited by Clang.
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 537f29521fb7f..c8de10f951933 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ C23 Feature Support
   be completed).
 - Fixed a failed assertion with an invalid parameter to the ``#embed``
   directive. Fixes #GH126940.
+- Documented `WG14 N3006 
<https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3006.htm>`_
+  which clarified how Clang is handling underspecified object declarations.
 
 C11 Feature Support
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/test/C/C23/n3006.c b/clang/test/C/C23/n3006.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..033e0b407e7f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/C/C23/n3006.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c23 -verify %s
+
+/* WG14 N3006: Yes
+ * Underspecified object declarations
+ */
+
+void struct_test(void) {
+  struct S1 { int x, y; };                                                  // 
expected-note {{field 'x' has type 'int' here}}
+
+  auto normal_struct = (struct S1){ 1, 2 };
+  auto normal_struct2 = (struct S1) { .x = 1, .y = 2 };
+  auto underspecified_struct = (struct S2 { int x, y; }){ 1, 2 };
+  auto underspecified_struct_redef = (struct S1 { char x, y; }){ 'A', 'B'}; // 
expected-error {{type 'struct S1' has incompatible definitions}} \
+                                                                               
expected-error {{cannot use 'auto' with array in C}} \
+                                                                               
expected-note {{field 'x' has type 'char' here}}
+  auto underspecified_empty_struct = (struct S3 { }){ };
+  auto zero_init_struct = (struct S4 { int x; }){ 0 };
+  int field_struct = (struct S5 { int y; }){ 0 }.y;
+}
+
+void union_test(void) {
+  union U1 { int a; double b; };                                               
   // expected-note {{field 'a' has type 'int' here}}
+
+  auto normal_union_int = (union U1){ .a = 12 };
+  auto normal_union_double = (union U1){ .b = 2.4 };
+  auto underspecified_union = (union U2 { int a; double b; }){ .a = 34 };
+  auto underspecified_union_redef = (union U1 { char a; double b; }){ .a = 'A' 
}; // expected-error {{type 'union U1' has incompatible definitions}} \
+                                                                               
      expected-error {{cannot use 'auto' with array in C}} \
+                                                                               
      expected-note {{field 'a' has type 'char' here}}
+  auto underspecified_empty_union = (union U3 {  }){  };
+}
+
+void enum_test(void) {
+  enum E1 { FOO, BAR };                                           // 
expected-note {{enumerator 'BAR' with value 1 here}}
+
+  auto normal_enum_foo = (enum E1){ FOO };
+  auto normal_enum_bar = (enum E1){ BAR };
+  auto underspecified_enum = (enum E2 { BAZ, QUX }){ BAZ };
+  auto underspecified_enum_redef = (enum E1 { ONE, TWO }){ ONE }; // 
expected-error {{type 'enum E1' has incompatible definitions}} \
+                                                                     
expected-error {{cannot use 'auto' with array in C}} \
+                                                                     
expected-note {{enumerator 'ONE' with value 0 here}}
+  auto underspecified_empty_enum = (enum E3 {  }){ };             // 
expected-error {{use of empty enum}}
+  auto underspecified_undeclared_enum = (enum E4){ FOO };         // 
expected-error {{variable has incomplete type 'enum E4'}} \
+                                                                     
expected-note {{forward declaration of 'enum E4'}}
+}
+
+void constexpr_test(void) {
+  constexpr auto ce_struct = (struct S1){ 1, 2 };                   // 
expected-error {{variable has incomplete type 'struct S1'}} \
+                                                                       
expected-note {{forward declaration of 'struct S1'}}
+  constexpr auto ce_struct_zero_init = (struct S2 { int x; }){ 0 };
+  constexpr int ce_struct_field = (struct S3 { int y; }){ 0 }.y;
+  constexpr auto ce_union = (union U1){ .a = 12 };                  // 
expected-error {{variable has incomplete type 'union U1'}} \
+                                                                       
expected-note {{forward declaration of 'union U1'}}
+
+  constexpr auto ce_enum = (enum E1 { BAZ, QUX }){ BAZ };
+  constexpr auto ce_empty_enum = (enum E2){ FOO };                  // 
expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'FOO'}}
+}
+
+void self_reference_test(void) {
+  constexpr int i = i;  // expected-error {{constexpr variable 'i' must be 
initialized by a constant expression}} \
+                           expected-note {{read of object outside its lifetime 
is not allowed in a constant expression}}
+  auto j = j;           // expected-error {{variable 'j' declared with deduced 
type 'auto' cannot appear in its own initializer}}
+}
+
+void redefinition_test(void) {
+  const struct S { int x; } s;  // expected-warning {{default initialization 
of an object of type 'const struct S' leaves the object uninitialized}} \
+                                   expected-note {{previous definition is 
here}}
+  constexpr struct S s = {0};   // expected-error {{redefinition of 's'}}
+}
+
+void declaring_an_underspecified_defied_object_test(void) {
+  struct S { int x, y; };
+  constexpr int i = (struct T { int a, b; }){0, 1}.a;
+
+  struct T t = { 1, 2 };
+}
+
+void constexpr_complience_test(void) {
+  int x = (struct Foo { int x; }){ 0 }.x;
+  constexpr int y = (struct Bar { int x; }){ 0 }.x;
+}
+
+void builtin_functions_test(void) {
+  constexpr typeof(struct s *) x = 0;
+  auto so = sizeof(struct S {});
+  auto to = typeof(struct S {});        // expected-error {{expected 
expression}}
+}
+
+void misc_test(void) {
+  constexpr struct S { int a, b; } y = { 0 };
+  constexpr int a = 0, b = 0;
+  auto c = (struct T { int x, y; }){0, 0};
+  auto s2 = ({struct T { int x; } s = {}; s.x; });
+  auto s3 = ((struct {}){},0); // expected-warning {{left operand of comma 
operator has no effect}}
+  constexpr int (*fp)(struct X { int x; } val) = 0;
+  auto v = (void (*)(int y))0;
+}
+
+void misc_struct_test(void) {
+  constexpr struct {
+      int a;
+  } a = {};
+
+  constexpr struct {
+      int b;
+  } b = (struct S { int x; }){ 0 };  // expected-error-re {{initializing 
'const struct (unnamed struct at {{.*}}n3006.c:104:13)' with an expression of 
incompatible type 'struct S'}}
+
+  auto z = ({
+      int a = 12;
+      struct {} s;
+      a;
+  });
+}
diff --git a/clang/www/c_status.html b/clang/www/c_status.html
index e47466e3273f2..dcff2fc2b1a3e 100644
--- a/clang/www/c_status.html
+++ b/clang/www/c_status.html
@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ <h2 id="c2x">C23 implementation status</h2>
     <tr>
       <td>Underspecified object definitions</td>
       <td><a 
href="https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3006.htm";>N3006</a></td>
-      <td class="none" align="center">No</td>
+      <td class="unreleased" align="center">Yes</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Type inference for object declarations</td>

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140911
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to