mprobst added a comment. So, currently clang-format doesn't really understand trailing commas in parenthesized lists (such as parameter declarations or lists). It should, and coincidentally I was just yesterday trying to get that working in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33023.
Regarding the option – I'm not sure we need to introduce an option for this. I think I'd prefer to just always break before the `l_paren` if the parenthesized list has a trailing comma, similar to how we format array or object literals. I'm not sure about indentation of this though, there are multiple options that all seem reasonable-ish: // (1) wrap back to 0 indent fnCall( param, param, param, ); function fnDecl( param, param, param, ) { code(); here(); } // (2) wrap to +4 indent fnCall( param, param, param, ); function fnDecl( param, param, param, ) { code(); here(); } // (3) keep on line fnCall( param, param, param,); function fnDecl( param, param, param,) { code(); here(); } I was personally thinking more of option (2), as it's uncommon to me to wrap like (1) in the call situation. On the other hand (1) does look a lot better in the call situation, and also leaves more space for a return type. It's a stylistic question, so there isn't really a right or wrong, but I'd be cool with either of these, maybe with a preference for (1). But in any case, if we can find agreement here, I think we should not introduce an option, and just make it how `clang-format` behaves for JS/TS code with trailing commas. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits