Typz added a comment. Or would it be better to replace (i.e. deprecate) the BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma option with a multiple choice option, as suggested here: http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/clang-format-Proposal-for-a-new-style-for-constructor-and-initializers-line-break-td4041595.html
/// \brief Different ways to break initializers. enum BreakConstructorInitializersStyle { /// Constructor() /// : initializer1(), /// initializer2() BCIS_BeforeColonAfterComma, /// Constructor() /// : initializer1() /// , initializer2() BCIS_BeforeColonAndComma, /// Constructor() : /// initializer1(), /// initializer2() BCIS_AfterColonAndComma }; BreakConstructorInitializersStyle BreakConstructorInitializers https://reviews.llvm.org/D32479 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits