AaronBallman wrote: > Also, this is ANOTHER bit on function types that we're using for CFI. I'm > wondering if this is actually a generally useful enough feature to be using > this much compiler resources. > > @AaronBallman ?
I think CFI is pretty important for security posture (it basically tries to ensure that indirect jumps don't go to unintended locations). So I think it's useful, but I am also a bit worried that we're missing the big picture of how much work needs to be done to fully support CFI. @bwendling do you expect to land more related attributes after this one? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141846 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
