================ @@ -1881,6 +1881,19 @@ OutputIt move(R &&Range, OutputIt Out) { return std::move(adl_begin(Range), adl_end(Range), Out); } +/// Provide wrappers to std::includes which take ranges instead of having to +/// pass begin/end explicitly. +template <typename R1, typename R2> bool includes(R1 &&Range1, R2 &&Range2) { + return std::includes(adl_begin(Range1), adl_end(Range1), adl_begin(Range2), + adl_end(Range2)); +} + +template <typename R1, typename R2, typename Compare> +bool includes(R1 &&Range1, R2 &&Range2, Compare C) { + return std::includes(adl_begin(Range1), adl_end(Range1), adl_begin(Range2), + adl_end(Range2), C); ---------------- kuhar wrote:
For `forward` you'd have to pass `C` as `Compare &&` in the function signature. This way it will be moved if the caller passes an rvalue reference. > I just have a question that why other places no need to forward C? Most wrappers assume that predicates/comparators are cheap to copy (e.g., function pointer), but if they are not, each additional wrapper adds a layer of copying. This suggestion was optional -- I don't think we strictly need it now, but it doesn't hurt to use `forward` now so that we don't have to update this code in the future. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143297 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits