================
@@ -1931,15 +1931,13 @@ Parser::ParseCXXCondition(StmtResult *InitStmt, 
SourceLocation Loc,
       return ParseCXXCondition(nullptr, Loc, CK, MissingOK);
     }
 
-    ExprResult Expr = [&] {
-      EnterExpressionEvaluationContext Eval(
-          Actions, Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated,
-          /*LambdaContextDecl=*/nullptr,
-          /*ExprContext=*/Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord::EK_Other,
-          /*ShouldEnter=*/CK == Sema::ConditionKind::ConstexprIf);
-      // Parse the expression.
-      return ParseExpression(); // expression
-    }();
+    EnterExpressionEvaluationContext Eval(
----------------
erichkeane wrote:

Ah, I see!  Though, this covers the `InitStmt`/`ParseCXXCondition` as well.  It 
isn't 100% clear to me what THAT does here (looks like it is for an init 
statement?).  I wonder if this doesn't cover that right.  I would imagine the 
eval context THEN needs to cover the condition after that?  

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146890
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to