================ @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#ifndef __CLC_OPENCL_ATOMIC_ATOMIC_COMPARE_EXCHANGE_STRONG_H__ +#define __CLC_OPENCL_ATOMIC_ATOMIC_COMPARE_EXCHANGE_STRONG_H__ + +#define FUNCTION atomic_compare_exchange_strong ---------------- frasercrmck wrote:
We should probably be only declaring/defining these OpenCL builtins according to the appropriate language features. For instance, for `atomic_compare_exchange_strong` we have: ``` c // Requires OpenCL C 3.0 or newer and both the __opencl_c_atomic_order_seq_cst // and __opencl_c_atomic_scope_device features. ``` The CLC functions are probably fine and we can unconditionally include them, for simplicity. But I feel we should be adhering to the spec for OpenCL builtins. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146814 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
