vbvictor wrote:

As a side note, should we create a clang-tidy check to detect these cases 
automatically: to use `llvm` algorithms instead of `std` and so on?
Is it documented that we should always prefer the `llvm` version?
I see a lot of work by @kazutakahirata and wish to make it future-proof because 
any new contributor could use `std` version as it is the most familiar one.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151801
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to