rogfer01 added a comment.
Given that we are already considering extensions, maybe you want to add a test
for compound statements in expressions.
void foo(void)
{
({ bar(); });
int (*p)() = bar; /* expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'bar'}}
*/
}
This already works with your patch: just to make clear how we interact with it.
================
Comment at: test/Sema/implicit-decl.c:12
int32_t compCount = 0;
- if (_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV(compDesc, vector, compCount)) { //
expected-note {{previous implicit declaration is here}} \
- expected-error {{implicit declaration of function
'_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV' is invalid in C99}}
+ if (_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV(compDesc, vector, compCount)) { //
expected-error {{implicit declaration of function
'_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV' is invalid in C99}}
}
----------------
Is there a way not to lose the note?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
