================
@@ -365,12 +365,14 @@ __m64 test_mm_mulhi_pi16(__m64 a, __m64 b) {
// CHECK: call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse2.pmulh.w(
return _mm_mulhi_pi16(a, b);
}
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(match_v4hi(_mm_mulhi_pi16((__m64)(__v4hi){+1, -2, +3, -4},
(__m64)(__v4hi){-10, +8, +6, -4}), -1, -1, 0, 0));
__m64 test_mm_mulhi_pu16(__m64 a, __m64 b) {
// CHECK-LABEL: test_mm_mulhi_pu16
// CHECK: call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse2.pmulhu.w(
return _mm_mulhi_pu16(a, b);
}
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(match_v4hi(_mm_mulhi_pu16((__m64)(__v4hi){+1, -2, +3, -4},
(__m64)(__v4hi){-10, +8, +6, -4}), 0, 7, 0, -8));
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
It should be correct (and it matches what DAG constant folding does), what
concerns you? Would it be better if I added a match_v4u so we can show as
unsigned results?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152540
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
