jhuber6 wrote: > Thanks! This functionality is much needed. Would it be better if we add it as > a flag in the existing `clang-linker-wrapper` tool, instead of adding a new > tool?
Honestly a lot of those clang tools should be made LLVM tools anyways. There's plenty of existing LLVM tools that only exist for testing purposes so I think it's reasonable to keep things simple here. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153504 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
