================
@@ -1887,7 +1887,19 @@ class CodeCompleteFlow {
for (auto &Cand : C.first) {
if (Cand.SemaResult &&
Cand.SemaResult->Kind == CodeCompletionResult::RK_Declaration) {
- auto ID = clangd::getSymbolID(Cand.SemaResult->getDeclaration());
+ const NamedDecl *DeclToLookup = Cand.SemaResult->getDeclaration();
+ // For instantiations of members of class templates, the
+ // documentation will be stored at the member's original
+ // declaration.
----------------
HighCommander4 wrote:
> do we know why the discrepancy exists between templated-code itself vs
> non-templated decls (i.e. how come we get the decl with comments when we're
> looking at `foo<int>()`)?
I'm not sure I'm following. Is `foo` is a function template here? In what
context are you requesting completion?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153337
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
