AaronBallman wrote: > Static analysis flagged that the non-static member Semantics was not > initialized by the default default constructor. Fix is to initialize it using > in class member initialization.
Yeah, this might be one better to mark as Intentional in the static analysis tool; there really isn't a sensible default value to begin with, so getting sanitizer coverage seems like a better approach IMO. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153671 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
