erichkeane wrote: > > I clicked accept, but not sure I'm super in favor of the name? Maybe see if > > folks will bikeshed it for you? I'm a bit concerned it is too close to > > other things (vector is ambiguous of course). > > Maybe: > > `boolean_gnu_vector_type` and `boolean_ext_vector_type` > > WDYT? > > Yeah, I was wondering about that. I don't think we support the GNU vectors to > be boolean yet so it can be a little confusing. Maybe just > `ext_vector_type_boolean`?
ah, sure. Then when/if we get `gnu` version we can do `gnu_vector_type_boolean`? Works for me and is 'specific' enough I'm no longer worried. Make it so :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
