================
@@ -4404,14 +4404,19 @@ CompareImplicitConversionSequences(Sema &S, 
SourceLocation Loc,
     Result = CompareStandardConversionSequences(S, Loc,
                                                 ICS1.Standard, ICS2.Standard);
   else if (ICS1.isUserDefined()) {
+    auto ConvFunc1 = ICS1.UserDefined.ConversionFunction;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:

> The LLVM Coding Standards argue for `auto` in "other places where the type is 
> already obvious from the context." I thought that's the case here...

That mostly applies to cases where the type is already explicitly mentioned in 
the initialiser, usually because it’s some sort of `cast<>`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154158
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to