zmodem wrote: > Maybe we should make the compiler insert a nop after inline asm blocks marked > "unwind"? Shifting the burden to the user seems error-prone, and the extra > nop is unlikely to matter much.
+1 this sounds like a good way to unbreak users. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
