================
@@ -42,7 +42,21 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY MetalConverter : public Tool {
const llvm::opt::ArgList &TCArgs,
const char *LinkingOutput) const override;
};
+
} // namespace hlsl
+
+class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY LLVMObjcopy : public Tool {
+public:
+ LLVMObjcopy(const ToolChain &TC) : Tool("LLVMObjcopy", "llvm-objcopy", TC) {}
+
+ bool hasIntegratedCPP() const override { return false; }
+
+ void ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
+ const InputInfo &Output, const InputInfoList &Inputs,
+ const llvm::opt::ArgList &TCArgs,
+ const char *LinkingOutput) const override;
+};
----------------
bogner wrote:
`LLVMObjcopy` fairly generic, even if we are only using it in the HLSL
toolchain right now. Should this class be defined somewhere less toolchain
specific?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154454
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
